
Hungarian PM Orban’s Aide Sparks Outrage with Comment on Soviet Invasion
By Krisztina Than
BUDAPEST – A senior aide to Prime Minister Viktor Orban sparked controversy by suggesting that Hungary might have been better off if it hadn’t resisted the Soviet invasion in 1956. His comments also included criticism of Ukraine’s fight against Russian forces.
Orban, who rose to prominence in 1989 by demanding the withdrawal of Soviet troops from Hungary, labeled his aide’s comments as “ambiguous” and an error. The leader of Hungary’s opposition characterized the remarks as “traitorous.”
In a recent interview, Balazs Orban, the prime minister’s political director, stated that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy acted recklessly by resisting Russia’s invasion in February 2022, which he claims has resulted in significant loss of life and territory.
“Reflecting on 1956, we probably wouldn’t have done what President Zelenskiy did two and a half years ago, as it was irresponsible, leading his country into a defensive war,” the aide said. He added that Ukraine’s decision, while a sovereign right, would not have been recommended based on Hungary’s historical experience in 1956.
The Hungarian uprising of 1956 against Soviet rule was violently suppressed by Soviet forces. Its anniversary on October 23 is a significant national event.
Speaking on national radio, Orban emphasized the need for careful and clear communication regarding such sensitive topics. He acknowledged that the comments made by his political director were a mistake, affirming that Hungary’s identity is rooted in the events of the 1956 uprising. He reaffirmed Hungary’s commitment to defending itself, just as it has always done.
The prime minister has faced criticism from Hungary’s NATO partners for maintaining strong economic relations with Russian President Vladimir Putin following the invasion of Ukraine. Under Orban’s leadership, Hungary has also declined to supply arms to Ukraine.
Balazs Orban did not respond to emailed inquiries, but he later asserted on social media that his comments had been “deliberately misinterpreted” and that the heroes of 1956 are considered national heroes.
His remarks ignited strong backlash from opposition parties and the media. Peter Magyar, a prominent opposition figure, stated on social media that the aide “has no place in public life” following his “scandalous and traitorous comments,” and accused him of dishonoring the memory of many Hungarian freedom fighters.